In the world of color, the absence or complete absorption of light results in “black” while the opposite, full reflection of light, is termed as “white”. In most cases, the absolute of either is rare; variations create a wide variety of colors or gray shades. A rainbow in the sky illustrates color composition by creating a spectrum of colors due to reflection, dispersion and refraction of light by water droplets.
Just as light can be seen in a variety of forms, so can other physical and psychological aspects of our lives. Absolutes are extremely rare leaving a host of behavioral possibilities when considering future actions. On the political scene, the diversity of colors and shades of gray are often confusing and, in some cases, contradictory. While a final goal may seem reasonable and agreeable to the vast majority of the electorate, how to achieve it is often in dispute.
Typically, major problems surface due to a variety of causes and over a period of time. While an issue may have deep and complex roots, once recognized as a threat, simple and immediate solutions are sought and applauded. Unfortunately, this approach is often short-sighted and can create unforeseen and even greater difficulties. Authoritarian regimes and fascist ideologies thrive on simplistic solutions with the promise of order in exchange for freedom of thought and action. The best defense for a free society is the knowledge of this trade and its human cost.
Of course, the opposite of dictatorial control is anarchy in which everyone has equal authority and, as a consequence, total agreement and therefore, order, cannot exist. So, what to do?
The constant push-pull of these two opposites is constantly at play in our political system. Major issues such as homelessness, economic prosperity, urban design and family values are subject to group dynamics that affect our quality of life. In our system of democracy, collective decisions through government address societal problems. This power is given to elected representatives who face the awesome task of working within a vast spectrum of possibilities to create a color or shade that is at least satisfactory to a majority of constituents – a herculean task. This is not an excuse for poor preparation or failure to adequately address issues, but recognition of the mission.
The best response from residents and citizens to this responsibility is constant reminders to our representatives of their choice to serve and respectful, civil but firm support for favored actions. Through consistent and reasoned pressure, complex issues can be addressed in a manner that appreciates the diversity of opinions and solutions available. It is best to keep in mind that in most cases, people are involved in the problem and the solution. Homeless people are real human beings, but so are residents of neighborhoods affected by encampments. Is one group better or more deserving than the other?
The same type of discussion can be found in different arenas. Recently, alternative configurations of Paseo Padre Parkway in Fremont were considered at a city council meeting. Which group of users take precedence – commuters, residents, bike riders? Council comments were thoughtful and divergence of opinion was not over the problem, rather the extent and choices available through staff recommendations. Recognition of a spectrum of choices led to a split vote that indicated the complexity of street design and traffic flow. In this case, and many others, the vote and direction of council represents a beginning rather than a complete solution. Continued resident input and oversight is a keystone to interpreting and addressing the many shades of gray in our communities.